Legal Opinion
Lizak v. Rottenbucher
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided May 28, 1947No. Docket 147/572PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In its monetary dimension this cause is not spectacular, yet in it counsel have found accommodations for some dialectics. A concise narrative of the factual events will sufficiently exhibit the essence of the controversy.
The complainant offered to purchase from the defendants for the sum of $6,000 the tavern business with furniture and fixtures conducted at No. 299 Neilson Street, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Necessarily the complainant was thereby to acquire the retail liquor license by virtue of which the business was being pursued and a lease of the premises in which the enterprise was…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ryan v. Motor Credit Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Prindiville v. Johnson & HigginsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Levy v. Massachusetts Accident Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
- Levy v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Blum Building Co. v. IngersollNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ray v. Beneficial Fin. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- DIAL PRESS, INC. v. PhillipsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Piechowski v. MatareseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Thomas v. Camden Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Young v. George C. Fuller Contracting Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.