People v. Munoz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEDSWORTH, Acting P. J.
In People v. Ortiz (1990) 51 Cal.3d 975 [275 Cal.Rptr. 191, 800 P.2d 547] (Ortiz), our Supreme Court held a criminal defendant has the right to relieve his retained attorney and have new counsel appointed without demonstrating his retained attorney is incompetent. The issue in this case is whether Ortiz applies when the defendant seeks to relieve his retained attorney and have new counsel appointed after the defendant has been convicted. We hold that in the circumstances of this case, it does. Because the trial court ruled otherwise, and because the record shows…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. DiazCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Lopez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Alvarado CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Chan CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Martin CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Mitchell CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.