Legal Opinion

William A. McConnell Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Meba Medical and Benefits Plan, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1985No. 84-1858, 84-1905PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILLIAM, District Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant William McConnell appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, denying his motions for attorneys’ fees under Section 502(g)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(1), for punitive damages, and for prejudgment interest at a rate greater than 1%. Defendant-appellee, the MEBA Medical and Benefits Plan (hereinafter “MEBA District 1” or “District 1”) cross-appeals the district court’s granting of summary judgment for William McConnell. We affirm the district…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Don Ray Smith v. Cmta-Iam Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Lillian Yanks Rehmar v. Bernard L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. DunnahooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Reverend W. Eugene Scott v. Evelle J. YoungerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. George L. Barry v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Backlund v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Backlund v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Schoenholtz v. DonigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. Amesco Exports, Inc. v. Associated Aircraft Manufacturing & Sales, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API