Legal Opinion

Backlund v. Barnhart

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1985No. 85-3940PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

778 F.2d 1386

William BACKLUND, and Patricia Backlund, his wife, Amy

Backlund, a minor, Pamela Backlund, f/a/k/a Pamela

Mortenson, a minor, and William

Backlund, Guardian ad Litem,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Patricia S. BARNHART and John Doe Barnhart, her husband;

Carlene Brevik and John Doe Brevik, her husband;

Nancy Ann Cole and John Doe Cole, her

husband, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85-3940.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 2, 1985.

Decided Dec. 17, 1985.

Nathan James Neiman, Redmond, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Betty Edwards, Olympia, Wash., for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Backlund v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Fuller v. M.G. JewelryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
  3. Gasho v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Sweaney v. Ada CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. James F. Taylor v. MacE KnappCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API