Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 8, 2000No. A00A1470PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

State Farm appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion to enter judgment on a cross-claim, based on its statutory subrogation right as an uninsured motorist carrier.1 Defendant Miller’s car was struck from behind by a “John Doe” driver, causing his vehicle to collide with plaintiff Wright’s vehicle. When Wright sued Miller to recover for injuries sustained in the accident, she also served her uninsured motorist (UM) carrier, appellant State Farm. State Farm answered in its own name and cross-claimed against Miller pursuant to OCGA § 33-7-11 (d). Thus State Farm…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Krasaeath v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Majors v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Lewis v. Cherokee InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  4. Johnson v. AmersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Cherokee Insurance v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Medical Staffing Network, Inc. v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Goldsmith v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API