Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Holifield

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 19, 1995No. 94-3424, 94-3426 and 94-3425UnknownCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Robert Holifield pled guilty in 1994 to five counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Supp. V 1993). The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court acted within its discretion in its application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We will affirm.

I

From March 13, 1992, to June 12, 1992, Holifield engaged in a wire fraud scheme in the Middle and Western Districts of Pennsylvania. Holifield telephoned various persons, falsely representing himself to be a corporate officer of Diamond Marketing Company, V.I.P.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. Joshua Carl RedmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Robert Andrew NottinghamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Holifield, A/K/A Jim Davis, A/K/A Philip Sharp, A/K/A David Jones, Robert Holifield, United States of America v. Robert A. Holifield, Robert HolifieldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. (SS) Cortez v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (SS) Fideldy v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (SS) Grace Garcia v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (SS) Hindsman v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API