Legal Opinion

State v. McKenna

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1991No. A90A2068PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

After appellee was charged with driving under the influence, he filed a pre-trial motion to exclude from evidence both a printout showing the results of his Intoximeter test and any testimony with regard thereto. The trial court granted appellee’s motion, based upon its determination that the printout had been materially altered. The order was certified for immediate review and the State appeals from the trial court’s evidentiary ruling pursuant to this court’s grant of its application for interlocutory appeal.

Although this court granted the State’s application for an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. StrickmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. State v. HollomonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. The STATE v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Flowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. State v. LavellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. State v. RoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. State v. PastoriniCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API