Tamaqua Cable Products Corp. v. Dunlap Electronics, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HUYETT, District Judge.
Defendant Dunlap Electronics, Inc. (Dunlap) has filed a motion to dismiss this action for lack of personal jurisdiction, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). Dunlap contends that it lacks the requisite “minimum contacts” with Pennsylvania necessary to subject it to personal jurisdiction under the Pennsylvania long-arm statute, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5301 et seq.
This action arises from a dispute between Tamaqua Cable Products Corp. (Tamaqua) and Dunlap concerning the manufacture of cable for use by Dunlap in fulfilling a contract with the United States Department of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- In-Flight Devices Corporation v. Van Dusen Air, Incorporated, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain State Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Strick Corp. v. A. J. F. Warehouse Distributors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Allied Leather Corp. v. Altama Delta Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co. v. Geko-Mayo, GmbHDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Devault of Delaware, Inc. v. Omaha Public Power DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Alston & Gunn v. SolomonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.