Legal Opinion
James Adams, et al. v. Guillermo Gharib, et al.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 23, 2026No. 1:24-cv-09378Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDS SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT en ne ne ee eee eee eee ee x ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAMES ADAMS, et al. DOC #: DATE FILED: _3/23/2026 Plaintiffs, -against- 24-cv-9378 (LAK) GUILLERMO GHARIB, et al., Defendants. ce ee eee ee ee ee ee et ee ee ee eee ee ee eee HHH HH HX MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. This action arises from an alleged Ponzi scheme in which defendants allegedly induced investors to purchase and hold valueless non-fungible tokens (“NFTs’”) and cryptocurrency to access…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,557 Irving Mariash v. Charles Morrill and Bernard Berwick, and David R. PokrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Grammenos v. LemosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Steinberg & Lyman v. TakacsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- United States v. ChowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021