Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Derk

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1998No. 25 Middle District Appeal Docket 1997PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

NEWMAN, J., files an Opinion in Support of Affirmance in which CASTILLE and NIGRO, JJ., join. CAPPY, J., files an Opinion in Support of Reversal in which FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, J., join.

OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE

NEWMAN, Justice.

We granted review in this matter limited to the issue of whether Appellant’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a “corrupt source” jury instruction. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the Superior Court because the record shows that trial counsel had a…

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. DurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. Abdul-SalaamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. People v. MartinezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API