Commonwealth v. Derk
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
NEWMAN, J., files an Opinion in Support of Affirmance in which CASTILLE and NIGRO, JJ., join. CAPPY, J., files an Opinion in Support of Reversal in which FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, J., join.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE
NEWMAN, Justice.
We granted review in this matter limited to the issue of whether Appellant’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a “corrupt source” jury instruction. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the Superior Court because the record shows that trial counsel had a…
3Cases cited28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. DurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. Abdul-SalaamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- People v. MartinezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.