Legal Opinion

Bills v. Willow Run I Apartments

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 20, 1995No. C4-94-2358PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge

Appellant Frank Bills (Bills) fell on the landing outside his apartment building, owned by respondent Willow Run I Apartments (Willow Run), a Minnesota partnership. He sued Willow Run for his injuries. During a jury trial, the trial court granted Willow Run’s motion for a directed verdict because Bills presented no evidence that Willow Run knew the landing and handrails were dangerous. The trial court denied Bills’s motion for a new trial, and he appeals. Because Willow Run’s building code violations were negligence per se, and because a verdict in favor of Bills would…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Johnson v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Judd v. LandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Claflin v. Commercial State Bank of Two HarborsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bills v. Willow Run I ApartmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Boyum v. Main Entree, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API