Legal Opinion

Deaton, Inc. v. Monroe

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 18, 2000No. 1981549PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deaton, Inc., filed this action in the Montgomery Circuit Court against James P. Hayes, as commissioner of the Department of Revenue,1 and Charles Bishop, as commissioner of the Department of Agriculture and Industries, seeking a judgment declaring that the statute imposing the "Alabama Pump Inspection Fee"2 violates the Interstate Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution and declaring that a refund is due under the International Fuel Tax Agreement ("IFTA"). See U.S.C.A. § 31701(3). The trial court granted the motion to intervene filed by Mack Roberts, as commissioner of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. TracySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. B.K.W. Enterprises v. Tractor Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Southern United Fire Ins. Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Drummond v. LawleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Alabama Educ. Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Randolph ex rel. Randolph v. MonteeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API