Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Bache & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 31, 1964PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONSAL, District Judge.
Defendant, Bache & Co., moves before answer under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., for an order staying this action and directing plaintiff to arbitrate the issues between the parties.
Defendant is a partnership engaged in the business of securities and commodities broker, and plaintiff was a customer of defendant. The complaint alleges that on or about April 17, 1963, plaintiff was solicited by defendant to sell a put involving 85 London sugar futures contracts which were later purchased for plaintiff’s account, and to engage in other commodity…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Lummus Company v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., Lummus Company v. Honorable Archie O. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Robert Lawrence Co. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Reader v. Hirsch & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,365 Arthur Yale Kavit v. A. L. Stamm & Co., a Co Partnership, and Jack R. LevienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Sinva, Inc. v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Berman v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Stockwell v. Reynolds & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Brown v. Gilligan, Will & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.