Legal Opinion

Gambill v. Bare

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1977No. 7623DC771PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendants argue that G.S. 45-21.38, by implication, will not allow a mortgagee to sue his mortgagor on the underlying debt or note for purchase money for real property, and that the mortgagee can only foreclose on the deed of trust. The statute provides:

“In all sales of real property by mortgagees and/or trustees under powers of sale contained in any mortgage or deed of trust executed after February 6, 1933, ... , to secure to the seller the payment of the balance of the purchase price of real property, the mortgagee or trustee or holder of the notes secured by such mortgage or…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chemical Bank v. BelkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Bigley v. LombardoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. In Re the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by FullerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Ross Realty Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Brumley v. Mallard, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API