Schultz v. Harless
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McGILL, Justice.
This was a suit to recover damages for injury to a growing cotton crop during the year 1951, alleged to have been caused by a poison spray used for killing weeds, and alleged to have been allowed to drift onto the cotton. Appellees were plaintiffs and appellant defendant in the trial court. Trial was to- a jury and-on findings -favorable to plaintiffs judgment was rendered against defendant for $3,928.
Appellant has presented four points of appeal, three of which urge error in the improper admission of evidence, and one in the improper submission of a special issue inquiring as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Amarillo v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- International & Great Northern Railroad v. PapeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Texas & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- City of Austin v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Twin City Fire Ins. Co. v. TurnbowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
3Cited by16 opinions
- McMillen Feeds, Inc. of Texas v. HarlowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Matthew W. Dietz and T. J. Yancey v. Consolidated Oil & Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- International Harvester Company v. KeseyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Cutler Cranberry Co. v. Oakdale Electric CooperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Sun Pipe Line Co., Inc. v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.