Legal Opinion

Horan v. Frangella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1969Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum by the Court. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The petition for opportunity to ballot was properly rejected by Special Term on account of the insufficiency of the authenticating statements. A statement of the present address of the subscribing witness, as well as the date and place of last registration, is required (Matter of Lerner v. Cohen, 262 N. Y. 450; Matter of Dorsey v. Cohen, 268 N. Y. 620; Matter of Crosbie v. Cohen, 281 N. Y. 329). Application for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Dorsey v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Matter of Crosbie v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Matter of Lerner v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API