Legal Opinion

Matter of Crosbie v. Cohen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1939PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The subscribing witnesses failed to state the election and Assembly districts wherein were located their present addresses and the addresses from which they last registered.

We think this departure from the. requirements of section 135 of the Election Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 17), as amended by chapter 652 of the Laws of 1939, was so substantial as to invalidate the petition.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Special Term affirmed, without costs.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur;. O’Brien, J., taking no part.

Ordered…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hall v. HeffernanNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Pavis v. HeffernanNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Maurin v. AllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  4. Ramos v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Potash v. MolikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API