Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 1952No. Appeal, 150Published

1Dissent

*318Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Justice Horace Stern:

I dissent from what I consider an unjustified reversal of the judgment of the court below.

The chief problem in the law governing malicious prosecution actions is to maintain the delicate balance between the interest of society in the enforcement of the criminal law and the protection of the individual against unjustified criminal charges involving pecuniary loss and impairment of reputation.

In the present case plaintiff recovered a verdict, and defendant has appealed from the refusal of the trial court to enter judgment in its favor n.o.v. or to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Byers v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Conley v. MervisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Simpson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API