Legal Opinion

Loeb v. Globe Newspaper Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 1, 1980No. CA72-0897-Z, CA72-1028-Z and CA72-1029-ZPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ZOBEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in these cases are the publisher (Loeb v. Globe Newspaper Co., CA72-0897), editors (Bucknam v. Globe Newspaper Co. CA72-1029), and other employees (Adams, et al. v. Globe Newspaper Co. CA72-1028) of the Manchester (New Hampshire) Union Leader, a daily newspaper. They claim that the Boston Globe, another daily newspaper, “maligned” and “defamed” them in its editorials and in a syndicated column. The cases are before the court on defendant’s motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In each of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert NovakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Myers v. Boston Magazine Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. San Antonio Express News v. Dracos, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  5. Gist v. MacOn County Sheriff's DepartmentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API