Legal Opinion

Krissy M. Lamont v. Matthew J. Lamont

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2015No. 42588PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Jones, Justice

I. Nature of the Case

This expedited, permissive appeal presents a child custody dispute. Appellant Matthew Lamont and Respondent Krissy Lamont were married and have two minor children. After the divorce, Krissy was granted primary physical custody of the children, and until recently Krissy and Matthew resided in Salmon, Idaho. In June of 2014, however, Matthew learned that Krissy planned to relocate with the children to Meridian, Idaho. He filed a petition in magistrate court to modify the divorce decree to obtain primary physical custody of the children. Krissy filed a cross-petition to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nelson v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Koester v. KoesterIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Roberts v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hoskinson v. HoskinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. King v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Searle v. SearleIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Chelsea Reed v. Zane ReedIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Boe v. BoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Weaver v. WeaverIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Jane Doe (2016-01) v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API