Legal Opinion

Singer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 6, 1953No. 50146PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brings this suit under the Tucker Act, 24 Stat. 505, Title 28 United States Code, § 1491, seeking to recover $10,000 which he claims by virtue of defendant’s alleged breach of a lease. Plaintiff’s grantor, Mrs. Amelia Herr Bickham, has intervened as third party plaintiff adopting as her own plaintiff’s petition and evidence and asserting that if plaintiff cannot maintain this action, then she is entitled to judgment for the $10,000 claimed. By stipulation in open court the two plaintiffs ask that judgment be rendered for either or both of them jointly or severally.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Goodman v. NiblackSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Erwin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Judkins v. CharetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. E. Harold Patterson, Receiver for the Electro Nuclear Systems Corporation v. The United States, Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  2. Samuel W. Poorvu and Beatrice Poorvu v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  3. Webster Factors, Inc., and Alter Milberg and Lawrence Milberg, Plaintiff-Intervenors v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  4. Desciose v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API