United States v. Jones
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
This Memorandum Opinion sets forth in full the reasoning upon which the defendant’s objections to the admissibility of two post-arrest statements were sustained at the hearing held on October 9, 2002.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The defendant, Deborah D. Jones, was employed by the Richmond Police Department (“RPD”) as an office specialist in the Division of Warrant Information Services. On June 17, 2002, Lieutenant Shamus, a sworn RPD officer in the same RPD Division, executed a warrant for the arrest of Jones, for allegedly having taken part in a robbery. A…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. CalderonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. CheesemanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Tanco-BaezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- United States v. CheesemanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010