Legal Opinion

Warner v. Bockstahler

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1929No. 5191PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, C. J.

— Edward L. Brackett and wife executed a first mortgage on land owned by them, and later a second mortgage to secure the payment of three notes for $500 each. The second mortgage contained the recital that it was “subject to a certain first mortgage” of $2,400. The property was purchased from the Bracketts by appellant, and the instrument of conveyance contained the statement — “this deed is subject to a mortgage of $2400 .... also to a mortgage of $1500 .... ” The agreed purchase price was $5,400, and, deducting therefrom the amount of the two mortgages, appellant paid to the vendors the sum…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Savings Bank of San Diego v. Central Market Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Clark v. PaddockIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Roberts v. FitzallenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Brosseau v. LowyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Interstate Land & I. Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jeppesen v. Rexburg State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hinckley Estate Co. v. GurryIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. LandauCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Idaho Power Co. v. Benj. Houseman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Brandt v. BoninIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API