Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephen A. Pearson and John Petracelli

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 15, 1984No. 83-5161PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATKINS, District Judge:

Appellants John Petracelli and Stephen A. Pearson were convicted of violating the federal firearms statutes, 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861(d), (i). Petracelli was charged with one count of possessing an unregistered silencer and with one count of possessing a silencer not identified by a serial number. Pearson was charged with one count of possessing an unregistered rifle, one count of possessing an unregistered silencer and one count of possessing a silencer not identified by a serial number. Appellants were convicted on all five counts and were sentenced to a concurrent term of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Blue v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Pope v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. People v. HeishmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. HeardIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew PayneArizona Supreme Court · 2013

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API