State v. D'AURIA
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Presiding Judge.
The State appeals the trial court’s grant of defendant Ralph D’Auria’s plea in bar based on double jeopardy. The trial court found that the prosecutor at defendant’s first trial engaged in intentional misconduct, and this finding is supported by the record. But there is simply no evidence that the prosecutor acted with a specific intent to avoid an acquittal which was likely to occur in the absence of his misconduct. Accordingly, defendant’s retrial is not prohibited, and we reverse the grant of defendant’s plea in bar.
Defendant, a doctor, was convicted of sexual battery…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- United States v. GaryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- State v. LetticeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Prather v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- ALLEN v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.