Legal Opinion

Wassall v. DeCaro

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 29, 1996No. 95-3531UnknownCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity action alleging legal malpractice, the Populist Party, its Executive Director and National Chairman, Donald P. Wassail, various other Executive Committee Members, and the Populist Observer (“plaintiffs”) sue their former attorney, Jeffrey R. DeCaro, and the two law firms at which DeCaro practiced law while representing plaintiffs (“malpractice defendants”). The district court granted summary judgment for malpractice defendants, interpreting the Pennsylvania Supreme Court case Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod &…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Fishman v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Ziegelheim v. ApolloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  5. Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & KurianskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. WASSALL v. DeCAROCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API