Legal Opinion

Pulluaim v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 2002No. WD 60618PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.

Randall Pulluaim appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Pulluaim claims that the motion court *765clearly erred in denying his motion because it ruled on his pro se motion before his amended motion was even due to be filed. Because this court finds that the motion court clearly erred in ruling on Mr. Pulluaim’s pro se motion prior to the expiration of the time he had to file an amended motion, the judgment of the motion court is reversed. The cause is remanded to permit Mr. Pulluaim ninety days from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gehlert v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Scott McCabe, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API