Legal Opinion

Kalter v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1928No. Appeal 101PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Appellant was tbe plaintiff in an action of trespass and now appeals from an order setting aside a verdict in his favor for $2,000 and entering judgment for the defendant upon the whole record. In a right angle collision between one of defendant’s trolley cars and appellant’s automobile at the intersection of Stiles and Sixteenth Streets in the City of Philadelphia, appellant suffered serious personal injuries and his automobile was damaged. The negligence charged was excessive speed of the trolley car. Defendant offered no testimony, but submitted a point for binding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ely v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Wolf v. SpencerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Smathers v. Pittsburg & Butler Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Whitman v. StippSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rea v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Sklaroff v. Phila. R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Godshall v. Dietrich, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1929
  4. Phila. Dairy Prod. Co. v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API