Legal Opinion

Sklaroff v. Phila. R. T. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1930No. Appeal 334, 336PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

A careful review of all the evidence in this case, considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, satisfies us that Diamond, who was driving the Sklaroff truck when it was hit by the defendant’s trolley car, must be held guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law, and that defendant’s points for binding instructions should have been affirmed or judgments non obstante veredicto entered in its favor.

Island Road runs east and west. Two street car tracks are maintained along or upon it by defendant, one on the north side, for west bound traffic and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smathers v. Pittsburg & Butler Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Kalter v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Benamy v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Thornton Fuller Automobile Co. v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Camac v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shepliklian v. Philadelphia Rapid T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API