Legal Opinion

Citizens Bank v. Willing

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1920No. 15524PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered June 20, 1919, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a bill of exchange, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to recover upon a bill of exchange claimed to have been conditionally accepted by the defendant. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment sustaining the plaintiff’s right to recovery. From this judgment, the defendant appeals.

The facts are substantially as follows: The Red Cedar Company operated a mill at Anacortes in which was manufactured box shooks. The appellant, with offices in the city of Seattle, was engaged in the brokerage business, and in such business bought and sold box shooks.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. Flanagan Mills & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  2. Wolf v. WillitsIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Chicago House Wrecking Co. v. James H. Rice Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laube v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. In re C. A. Taylor Log & Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1925
  3. McMillan v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Michigan City Bank v. First State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API