Legal Opinion

School Dist. of City of Monessen v. Apostolou Associates, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 2000No. 209 WDA 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 Apostolou Associates (“Apostolou”) appeals the order adding it as a defendant and staying an arbitration proceeding. We affirm in part and quash in part.

¶2 In a contract dated February 7, 1994, the School District of the City of Monessen (“District”) engaged Apostolou, a sole proprietorship owned by Paul C. Apostolou, to provide architectural services for the design of a building to house the District’s Middle School and Senior High School. See Agreement Between Owner and Architect, 2/7/94 (“Contract”). The Contract provided, in relevant part, that

7.1.1 Any claim, dispute or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Midomo Co. v. Presbyterian Housing Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Noll by Noll v. Harrisburg Area YMCASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Premier Industrial Corporation v. Texas Industrial Fastener Company, Ed Roos, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Forrester v. HansonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. KoreskoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. South High Development v. Estate of Morgan, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API