Legal Opinion

William Clark v. American Marine & Salvage, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 23, 2012No. 12-12849UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

This appeal presents the issue whether an employee who performs a variety of tasks, including marine repairs, with most of his work on land, but other work on water, qualifies as a seaman under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30104, and general maritime law. The district court ruled that William Clark was not a seaman and entered summary judgment in favor of American Marine and against Clark’s complaint of unseaworthiness and maintenance and cure, under maritime law, and negligence, under the Jones Act. Because the record establishes that Clark’s work had no substantial connection to a vessel in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Harbor Tug & Barge Co. v. PapaiSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Jerome D. Wallace v. Oceaneering International, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee, and Cities Service Company v. Zapata Offshore Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Michael James Ardoin v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dize v. Association of Maryland PilotsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Larry Naquin, Sr. v. Elevating Boats, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. Riverport Insurance v. C&M Industries, Inc.Norfolk County Circuit Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API