Legal Opinion

Signature Combs, Inc. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided March 19, 2003No. 98-CV-2777 D, 98-CV-2968 D, 00-CV-2245 DPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

DONALD, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Mason and Dixon Lines, Inc. (“MDL”)’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), on Plaintiffs Signature Combs, Inc., et al. (“Plaintiffs”)’ Third Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) seeking cost recovery under 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(a)(3) and 96013(f)(1). MDL’s Mot. For J. On The Pleadings, Doc. # 217-1, Case # 98-cv-02777. MDL contends that Plaintiffs’ claims against it were discharged pursuant to MDL’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gottlieb v. KestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Malin v. JPMorganDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012
  3. Horen v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF TOLEDO CITY SCH. DIST.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  4. In Re Huffy Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  5. In Re ClevelandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API