Legal Opinion
State v. Cancel
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 9, 2005No. SC 16828PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
A jury found the defendant, Scott Cancel, guilty of murder as an accessory in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-54a (a) and 53a-8 (a) in connection with the strangulation death of the victim, Robert Schmidt. The trial court rendered judgment in accordance with the jury verdict, and the defendant appealed.1 The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in failing to replay for the jury all of the testimony that the juiy had requested *3to review at the outset of its deliberations.2 We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- PSE Consulting, Inc. v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Knapp v. KnappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. BermudezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. StennerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. LebrickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Gardner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.