Legal Opinion
Bloom v. Lower Paxton Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 11, 1983No. Appeal, No. 481 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Arthur J. Bloom, representing Harrisburg Fore Associates (developer), appeals an order of the Dauphin County Common Pleas Court, which sustained the decision of the Lower Paxton Township Board of Supervisors to deny the developer an extension of time in which to secure final approval of his subdivision plan.
*534On November 15, 1973, the developer submitted a preliminary plan to the township planning commission, describing a proposed townshouse apartment complex of 708 units called “Pond Ridge Village,” located on a 79-acre tract in an area zoned R-2 (permitting apartment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harrisburg Fore Associates v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Valley Run, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Board of Supervisors v. DiEgidioCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Traymore Associates v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Harjef's Corp. v. City of Philadelphia Tax Review BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morris v. South Coventry Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Glendon Energy Co. v. Borough of GlendonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- BR Associates v. Board of Commissioners of the Twp. of Upper St. Clair v. R. Ardonlino and T. Ardolino, h&w, and J. MendenhallCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Borough v. Township of MaxatawnyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Harwick v. Board of Supervisors of the Township of Upper SauconCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995