Legal Opinion

Sydner v. Mt. Sterling National Bank

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 30, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Casio 34 — PETITION ORDINARY — Briefs not in record.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bennett

The appellee is doing a banking business in this State under the United States hanking law. As such banking institution, it loaned the appellants money, and took their note therefor, charging them a usurious rate of interest and adding the same in the note, and at the maturity of the note, it was renewed and usurious interest again charged and included in the new note. Renewals were in like manner made and usurious interest added therein, until it resulted in the present note, when it was sued on. The appellants pleaded the foregoing facts in regard to the usury embraced in the several…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moniteau National Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Alves v. Henderson National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  3. Brown v. Marion National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. McCarthySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Louisville Trust Co. v. Kentucky Nat. BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Central National Bank v. HaseltineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Marion National Bank v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API