Legal Opinion

Brown v. Shortlidge

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1929No. Docket No. 6374PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant, a physician and surgeon, from a judgment entered against him in an action for damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff as a result of carelessness and negligence of the defendant in and about the performance of a minor surgical operation. • Plaintiff at the time of the operation was a child ■of the age of six years. Defendant, as a surgeon, had advised the necessity of the removal of the child’s tonsils and adenoids, and pursuant to that advice the child was taken to a hospital' for the operation. There is evidence that at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Wharton v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Evans v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Dimock v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Texas Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ales v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Vonault v. O'RourkeMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Bauer v. OtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API