Legal Opinion

Ferris v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 9, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00769Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-00769-RSE MARK FERRIS PLAINTIFF VS. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT Andrew Saul1 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, Mark Ferris (“Ferris”), seeks judicial review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of a final adverse decision by Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), to reduce the amount of his retirement insurance benefit in accordance with Section 215 of the Social Security Act, otherwise known as the “Windfall Elimination Provision.” See generally (DN 1); see…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frances Buxton v. William A. Halter, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Nancy A. COTTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary, Health & Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Perpich v. Department of DefenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Phyllis Elam, for Kamea Golay, a Minor v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Donald Larry Martin v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API