Legal Opinion

Yanoski v. Silgan White Cap Americas, LLC

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-01862PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

A. Richard Caputo, United States District Judge

Presently before the Court1 is a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 29) filed by Defendant Silgan White Cap Americas, LLC (“Defendant” or “Silgan”). Plaintiff James M. Yanoski (“Plaintiff’ or ‘Yano-ski”) asserts discrimination and retaliation claims against Defendant for allegedly terminating his employment based on his muscular dystrophy. In moving for summary judgment, Defendant asserts that Plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination and that even if he did, he failed to establish that the legitimate,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taha v. Bucks County PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Schirnhofer v. Premier Comp Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Jason Todd v. Disability Rights Pennsylvania, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. Jason Todd v. Disability Rights Pennsylvania, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. KAIRYS v. SOUTHERN PINES TRUCKING, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API