State v. Evans
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentSanders, J.
(dissenting) — The Washington Constitution’s prohibition against taking private property for private use is absolute: “Private property shall not be taken for private use . . . Const. art. I, § 16 (amend. 9). Where the condemned property is to be devoted to both a private and a public use, the constitutional prohibition has no less force:
If a private use is combined with a public use in such a way that the two cannot be separated, the right of eminent domain cannot be invoked.. . . [W]here the purpose of a proposed acquisition is to acquire property and devote only a portion of it to truly…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Vanhorne v. DorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1795
- City of Cincinnati v. Vester. Same v. Richards Same v. ReakirtSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Healy Lumber Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- In Re Petition of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.