Legal Opinion

State v. Evans

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1998No. 65607-0Published

1DissentSanders, J.

(dissenting) — The Washington Constitution’s prohibition against taking private property for private use is absolute: “Private property shall not be taken for private use . . . Const. art. I, § 16 (amend. 9). Where the condemned property is to be devoted to both a private and a public use, the constitutional prohibition has no less force:

If a private use is combined with a public use in such a way that the two cannot be separated, the right of eminent domain cannot be invoked.. . . [W]here the purpose of a proposed acquisition is to acquire property and devote only a portion of it to truly…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Vanhorne v. DorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1795
  2. City of Cincinnati v. Vester. Same v. Richards Same v. ReakirtSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Healy Lumber Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. In Re Petition of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API