Legal Opinion

Martin v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 29, 1931No. Docket Nos. 44776, 50946Published

Section 212(d) of the Revenue Act of 1926 does not permit taxpayers to take deductions for losses upon the installment basis.

1Opinion of the Court

DARWIN D. MARTIN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Martin v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 44776, 50946.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

24 B.T.A. 528; 1931 BTA LEXIS 1625;

October 29, 1931, Promulgated

Section 212(d) of the Revenue Act of 1926 does not permit taxpayers to take deductions for losses upon the installment basis.

Frank J. McGuire, Esq., and William H. Watson, Esq., for the petitioner.

J. E. Marshall, Esq., for the respondent.

MCMAHON

These are proceedings, duly consolidated for hearing and opinion, for the redetermination of deficiencies in income tax as follows:

D…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Gardner v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Scott v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Sacks v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API