Martin v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Section 212(d) of the Revenue Act of 1926 does not permit taxpayers to take deductions for losses upon the installment basis.
1Opinion of the Court
DARWIN D. MARTIN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Martin v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 44776, 50946.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
24 B.T.A. 528; 1931 BTA LEXIS 1625;
October 29, 1931, Promulgated
Section 212(d) of the Revenue Act of 1926 does not permit taxpayers to take deductions for losses upon the installment basis.
Frank J. McGuire, Esq., and William H. Watson, Esq., for the petitioner.
J. E. Marshall, Esq., for the respondent.
MCMAHON
These are proceedings, duly consolidated for hearing and opinion, for the redetermination of deficiencies in income tax as follows:
D…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Gardner v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Scott v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Sacks v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.