Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1944No. 29978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At the threshold of this discussion it should be noted that this action involves no claim for compensation for total disability resulting from silicosis. Partial disability alone is alleged by the relator in his petition.

The relator and the respondent agree that the answer to their question is found in the provisions of Section 1465-68a, General Code. The relator places great reliance upon the opening sentence of the section which provides in part that "Every employee who is disabled because of the contraction of an occupational disease as herein defined * * * shall * * * be entitled to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hobart Mfg. Co. v. BlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State ex rel. Marion Power Shovel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API