Legal Opinion

Mantle v. Casey

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1904No. 1,950PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; E. 17. Harney, Judge. . Action by Lee Mantle against George II. Casey and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. COMMISSIONER OLAYBERG

prepared the following opinion for the court:

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the court below upon the default of defendants for not appearing and answering-summons.

' Error is charged in the ruling of the court denying a motion to quash service of summons, in allowing default to be entered pending this motion, in striking defendants’ answer from the files, in refusing to set aside the default, and in entering the judgment. The judgment roll, with the proper bill of exceptions, constitutes the record upon appeal.

■' The chronological order of the various…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Calderwood v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Higley v. PollockNevada Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Shinn v. CumminsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. McDonald v. SwettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Chase v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mihelich v. Butte Electric Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Donlan v. Thompson Falls Copper & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Paramount Publix Corp. v. BoucherMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Missoula Belt Line Ry. Co. v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Canning v. FriedMontana Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API