Legal Opinion

Maxey v. Kadrovach

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided October 13, 1988No. Civ. 88-5034PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint on jurisdictional grounds, or alternatively for summary judgment. For purposes of the court’s discussion of the jurisdictional issues, it is assumed that the pertinent factual allegations of the amended complaint are true.

Plaintiff challenges, on several grounds, his termination from his employment as a probationary staff surgeon at the Veterans Administration Medical Center in Fayette-ville, Arkansas. The jurisdiction of the court is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. E. Stanton Maxey, M.D. v. Dan G. Kadrovach, David K. McAfee M.D., and the Veterans Administration, an Agency of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  2. Krueger v. LyngDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API