Legal Opinion

Broadnax v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 13, 1912No. 1819PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING.

November 12, 1912.

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

— Appeal was heretofore dismissed. For sufficient legal' reasons the case is reinstated to be disposed pf on its merits.

The indictment contains several counts charging a violation of the liquor laws in different ways, the first of which charged appellant with keeping a disorderly house by selling liquors in the house; the third count charged appellant with violating what is known as the FitzhughRobertson law regulating the retail of liquors, charging appellant with selling malt liquors without obtaining a license. The court submitted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lucio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Gerstenkorn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Thurman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Goble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API