Broadnax v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING.
November 12, 1912.
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
— Appeal was heretofore dismissed. For sufficient legal' reasons the case is reinstated to be disposed pf on its merits.
The indictment contains several counts charging a violation of the liquor laws in different ways, the first of which charged appellant with keeping a disorderly house by selling liquors in the house; the third count charged appellant with violating what is known as the FitzhughRobertson law regulating the retail of liquors, charging appellant with selling malt liquors without obtaining a license. The court submitted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lucio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Gerstenkorn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Thurman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Goble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917