Legal Opinion

Thurman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1904No. 2782PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSOH, Presiding Judge.

Conviction for violating the local option law, penalty assessed being a fine of $25 and twenty days confinement in the county jail. Appellant moved' to quash the indictment becaues the date of the%offense as alleged is uncertain; and it charges the offense was committed on two or more separate and distinct dates. The indictment is as follows: * * * “That Bub Thurman, on or about the-day of-, A. D. 190—, and anterior to the presentment of this indictment in-the county and State aforesaid, did then and there unlawfully on October 15th, 1901, an election in accordance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pitner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Lucio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Gersteman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. State v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Biddy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API