Legal Opinion
Errico v. Pacific Capital Bank, N.A.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 9, 2010No. Case 09-CV-04072-LHKPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
(re: docket # 23 and # 24)
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
William Errico, Loretta Ann Errico, and the William and Loretta Ann Errico Trust of 1972 (collectively “Plaintiffs”) bring suit against Pacific Capital Bank, N.A. and Ni-raj Mirah (collectively “Defendants”) alleging violations of the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1691 et seq., and violations based on various state causes of action. The thrust of Plaintiffs’ allegations, as stated in their Second Amended Complaint…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rockridge Trust v. Wells Fargo, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Boyd v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Green v. Central Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Gilmore v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Jackson v. FischerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.