Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Funk
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 2, 1992No. A92A1635PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
Following a jury verdict and judgment in favor of condemnee Dr. Sidney A. Funk, condemnors Fulton County and Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) appeal.
1. The appeal is not rendered moot under OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (3) by the condemnors’ payment into the registry of the court the difference between the amount originally paid in and the amount of the judgment. See Clayton County Water Auth. v. Harbin, 192 Ga. App. 257 (1) (384 SE2d 453) (1989). Appellee Funk’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
2. The case involves the condemnation of a medical office…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bowers v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Department of Transportation v. Dixie Highway Bottle Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Department of Transportation v. 2.734 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Housing Authority v. SchroederSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. FunkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. LeibowitzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Funk v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Department of Transportation v. Davison Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. FunkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.