Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Leibowitz
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Justice.
In a total taking, business property was condemned by appellantCondemnors. The issue of appellee-Condemnees’ just and adequate compensation was tried before a jury. Condemnors appealed to the Court of Appeals from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict. The eight judges on the Court of Appeals who participated were equally divided as to affirmance or reversal based upon the resolution of one enumeration of error. Accordingly, the case was transferred to this court pursuant to Art. VI, Sec. V, Par. V of the Ga. Const, of 1983.
1. Condemnor’s relevant enumeration of error…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bowers v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Garland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Department of Transportation v. Dixie Highway Bottle Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Irvin v. AskewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- City of College Park v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Department of Transportation v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- WILSON v. INTHACHAKSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. LeibowitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995