Legal Opinion

Brear v. Washington State Highway Commission

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1964No. 36646PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

Walter Brear, plaintiff-respondent, brought the present action to foreclose a statutory lien for the contract price of crushed rock he supplied to Washington Asphalt Company, defendant-appellant, for use in constructing the approaches to the Hood Canal bridge. The amount due Brear from Washington Asphalt on account of this bridge job (contract #6151) is not in dispute, and Brear has received payment on the amount due, less the sum of $2,934.16, claimed and withheld by Washington Asphalt Company as a setoff. The propriety of the alleged setoff, the principal issue in this appeal, involves…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garratt v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State ex rel. Washington Water Power Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. O'Connor v. TesdaleWashington Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nakanishi v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Brear v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Reilly v. SageserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. S & D Paving Co. v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API